On Huffington Post: When America Fell in Love with Speed

My latest item for Huffington Post is just up--it's about the era of board-track motorcycle racing, which was a brutal sport that thrived from 1908 thru the early 1920s. There's also more on this topic in the April issue of Smithsonian magazine.

Friday Photo Review: Qaddafi's Face, Rhianna's Behind, Immortal Elizabeth Taylor

As usual, my weekly review of selected photos from newspapers and magazines is up at Le Lettre de la Photographie. Also as usual, here is a sampling:

1. Go, Muammar, Go

You say Gaddafi, I say Qaddafi...in any language the dictator is a menace. The rest of the world learned to live with him because he's got oil, but then came the Arab Revolution. Then came the Arab Revolution of 2011, and a popular uprising, and a counter-attack by his government forces, and a no-fly zone enforced by a coalition of Western governments that used to buy his oil, and now Fareed Zakaria wonders in the April 4 issue of Time what might happen if Qaddafi (or Gaddafi, if you prefer) manages to hang onto power. That's a lot of narrative to express in one cover photo. The magazine went with a 2009 portrait taken by photographer Platon when the Libyan leader was visiting the United Nations in New York. (Read about the making of the photo here, especially the part about Qaddafi being surrounded by female body guards.) In this picture, crazy Muammar doesn't look crazy; shot from a relatively low level, the image communicates his power, and, in the curled upper lip, a sense of his cruelty.
 
2. Behind the Scenes with Rhianna

Recently I praised Annie Leibovitz's Vogue cover shot of Rhianna; she also covers the April 14 issue of Rolling Stone. Mark Seliger's portrait is a bit...trashier than Annie's, but Rolling Stone's readers are a bit different from Vogue's. Miraculously, Rhianna's appeal seems span the entire popular culture. (Poor Britney Spears--the cover make the explicit point that she is no longer the queen of pop. Her comeback? Oh, it's monster, which is not the same as monstrous, but whatever.)  I read one blog speculating that Rhainna's shorts were painted on, but I can't swear to it.

3. Remembering Her

If you are like me--and let's both hope you're not--you read a number of tributes to Elizabeth Taylor this past week. My favorite was in Time (Qaddafi on the cover). The great Richard Corliss wrote this about her: "Many talented tyros had been bred in the studio hothouse, but in the '40s, none came to flower so luxuriantly; in the '50s, none found so bracing a challenge in Hollywood's search for artistic maturity; and in the '60s, when the system collapsed, none survived it so craftily as Taylor did." Accompanying Corliss's essay was this portrait of Taylor and Montgomery Clift, her greatest costar, made on the Paramount lot in 1950 by Life magazine photographer Peter Stackpole. These people were professionals, and they knew what they were doing--her breasts and bottom jutting in opposite directions, his right hand giving an award-winning stand-in performance. Today's tastes require more forthright symbolism, of course--Rhianna with painted-on cutoff shorts, for instance.

4.  Remembering Reality

I will conclude with a portrait that has nothing to do with popular culture. This image, by Carlos Barria for Reuters, shows a woman examining the ground where her house once stood in the town of Kesennuma, in northern Japan. It was destroyed, completely, by the earthquake and tsunami of March 11. Pictures tell us so much, and yet they can be so elusive and frustrating. When I first saw this, I took the woman's gestures for sad resignation, perhaps mild shock. She may in fact be feeling those things, but her hands are in fact at her face because she is talking on a cell phone.

Iconic Wednesday: The Attempted Assassination of President Ronald Reagan

Thirty years ago today, a mentally unbalanced man named John Hinkley Jr. fired six shots from a Rohm RG-14 .22 caliber revolver, nearly killing the President of the United States. In the aftermath, a photographer would become famous, a Secretary of State would fumble a media (if not constitutional) test, and the country would once again spend a few minutes looking at astonishing pictures and wondering if perhaps something should be done about keeping guns out of the hands of lunatics.

Salgado recorded the scene outside the Washington Hilton after Hinkely's shots were fired

 On March 30, 1981, Ronald Reagan, the president for the past 69 days, gave a speech to ALF-CIO representatives at the Washington Hilton Hotel. Afterward, he left the building through its T Street NW exit, where his limousine was waiting. Hinkley, 25 at the time, was also waiting near the exit, standing in a group of Reagan admirers. Inspired by the movie Taxi Driver and obsessed with actress Jodie Foster, he had decided to assassinate the president. The Secret Service had screened the audience inside the hotel, but not the crowd on the sidewalk outside. Hinkley was standing about 15 feet away from the president when he fired, missing with each shot. He did hit White House Press Secretary James Brady, and a D.C. police officer. Another shot ricocheted off the president's armored limousine and struck Reagan under his left arm, eventually lodging in one of his lungs. Reagan's life was saved at George Washington University Hospital.

Standing on the sidewalk when it all happened was a 37-year-old Brazilian photographer named Sebastiao Salgado. A former economist, Salgado had spent the past decade documenting famine and civil war in Africa; in 1979 he joined the Magnum Photo agency; he happened to be in Washington D.C. in March of 1981 and was on hand to cover the president's speech at the Washington Hilton. He was the only professional photographer to record what happened when Hinckley fired, and his images appeared on newspaper front pages and magazine covers around the world.

It was a desperate, frightening time for Americans that day--take it from someone who spent the day watching network news anchormen (no women, no CNN) trying to piece together conflicting reports on the president's health. The situation wasn't helped when Secretary of State Alexander Haig--a former Army general and Nixon White House chief of staff--went into the White House press room to assure the country that everything was all right. In fact, he did the opposite.

The Vice-President of the United States, George H.W, Bush, happened to be travelling that day, and, quite naturally, the press wanted to know who was calling the shots while president was being operated on. Haig replied, "Don't worry. As of now I am in control here in the White House." Today it is generally understood that Haig was not in fact rejiggering the constitutional line of authority--when the president is incapacitated, the vice-president assumes control, whether he's in the White House or not--but on March 30, 1981 the statement made it sound as if Haig was unaware of such legal niceties.  At best. At worst, he was simply setting the constitution aside.

It was a moment that would haunt him for the rest of his days. When he died in 2010, the New York Times ran an obituary by Tim Weiner with three brilliant opening paragraphs:

Alexander Haig, the four-star general who served as a confrontational secretary of state of President Ronald Reaga and a commanding White House chief of staff as the Nixon administration crumbled, died Saturday at the Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, according to a hospital spokesman.He was 85.

Mr. Haig was a rare American breed: a political general. His bids for the presidency quickly came undone. But his amibtion to be president was thinly veiled, and that was his undoing. He knew, Reagan's aide Lyn Nofziger once said, that "the third paragraph of his obit" would detail his conduct in the hours after President Reagan was shot on March 30, 1981.

That day, Secretary of State Haig wrongly declared himself the acting president. "The helm is right here," he told members of the Reagan cabinet in the White House Situation Room, "and that means right in this chair for now, constitutionally, until the vice president gets here." His words were taped by Richard V. Allen, then the National Security Advisor.

Haig "in control" in the White House press room

It was the vision of Haig hotly addressing the press that I remember best from that day. This image of that moment--I cannot find a credit for the picture--became iconic and almost fondly remembered, once we learned to laugh about Haig's misstep. That's the way history works sometimes.

Visual Culture Monday: The Quick and the Dead

Here are a couple of things to look for this week in the world of images, starting with a bit of shameless self-promotion. 

1. Speed and Splinters

A.F. Van Order's portrait of rider Arthur Mitchell

 I thought I'd would call attention to a nice piece in the April issue of Smithsonian magazine...I think it's nice, anyway, since I wrote it. It's about one Ashley Frank Van Order, a photographer and motorcycle racing promoter who made some really astonishing pictures of young men participating in what might have been the most gruesome sport that America ever loved.

Harley-Davidson team rider Harry Crandall

 In the first decade of the 20th century, shortly after the Hendee Manufacturing Company introduced the Indian motorcycle (followed, a year later, by Harley Davidson), young men began racing the new machines. At first they competed on horse-race tracks and bicycle velodromes, but around 1908 some smart guys out in Los Angeles starting building big tracks meant especially for racing motorcycles. The tracks were made out of lengths of rough-cut lumber (better for traction) and banked very steeply--like, up to 60 degrees. the early racing motorcycles were esentially bicycles with englnes--the had to be towed behind other motorcycles to get them started, and as for stopping, well, that wasn't much of a concern--brakes were not included on the machines. Riders would whip around the tracks, propelled by gasoline and centrifugal forces, reaching speeds of more than a hundred miles an hour. And when they crashed, which was far too often, they died miserable deaths and horrible wounds from hundreds of splinters. Naturally, crowds flocked to see this happen.

The era was recorded by a few filmmakers, but it was A.F. Van Order who documented the sport best, with a large-format camera on glass plate negatives. He made action photos and wonderful portraits of the brave riders who risked everything. After his death in 1954, Van Order's negatives were more or less forgotten, and  and my research for the piece took me to Southern California, where I tracked down his relatives and learned about the time in America when horses gave way to horsepower. There should be a movie.

2. Post-Mortem Publicity

The heirs of Milton Greene, who made this famous photo of Marilyn in 1954, were among those who went to battle with the Monroe Estate.

 The New York Times has a terrific Op Ed piece today called concerning the issue of post-mortem right of publicity. The writer, Ray D. Madoff, a professor at Boston College Law School, does a superb job of clarifying this bizarre and shaky piece of law. (I've been sputtering about the issue for a few years now, and I almost always get myself tongue-tied when I try to explain it, so I encourage you to look at Madoff's piece.)

I first caught wind of post-mortem right of publicity when I wrote about a trial a few years back in California. The heirs of several photographers who had famously photographed Marilyn Monroe had gone to court to fight the Monroe Estate, which was and is legendary for asserting authority over the star's image and name. The essential question here is to what extent a dead person's image is considered private property. There is no federal right of publicity, so each state makes its own. California, home to many movie stars, passed a so-called post-mortem right of publicity law decades ago, giving the estates  the right to control the images and name of people even after they died. The backers of the law cited the need to protect dead celebrities from being exploited, but in reality the post-mortem right of publicity often paves the way for exploitation. The Monroe estate, run by a company in Indiana called CMG, has churched out all sorts of tacky Monroe merchandise. So a celebrity who has been dead for for nearly 50 years--who is part of the common cultural history of America--has become a business monopoly, a property controlled by a voracious company that has never minded stepping over copyright law to get what it wants. Which is money.

To the shock of many, the heirs of the photographers who went to battle against the Monroe estate back in 2007 triumphed in court; CMG then lobbied lawmakers in California to pass a new statute that would enable it to reassert it's control over the star's image and name. A state senator from Santa Monica duly got the new law passed. The attorney for the photographers then claimed that the new California law was beside the point, because though Monroe died in California she was in fact a legal resident of New York, which has no post-mortem right of publicity law. Yeah, it's complicated. Madoff argues that congress should enact a federal law that makes it clear that a person's name or image can be controlled for only a relatively short number of years after the celebrity's death. (Sort of like copyright law.) Even if there's a congressman who wants to wade into this issue, getting any law like Madoff suggests passed would be very difficult, considering the lobbying that would go on.

The Week in Photos: Devastation Above and Below the Surface

You can catch my full weekly photo review at Le Lettre de la Photographie; here, I'm focusing on images from Japan, where, in the week after the devastating earthquake and tsunami, reporting and visual documentation shifted from the immediate emergency to assessment and narrative. Visually, this was expressed in images taken from a variety of perspectives, from panoramic to intimate.

1. Dark Day After

In this photograph from STR/AFP/Getty Images (no name given in credit, unfortunately) the photographer has pulled back to reveal the ravaged landscape of Yamada town in Iwate prefecture, which on March 16 was dusted with snow. In the dim, cold blue light, the town might be a cemetary.

2. Little Hope

 Photographer Go Takayama shot this picture for AFP/Getty Images. Here, a volunteer bathes a 2-month-old who had been evacuated with his parents from Okuma, near the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Compared the the image above, this photograph provides warm light and, in the child, a hope for the future.

3. What Once Was

 The New Yorker's March 28 issue included a gripping narrative by Evan Oznos tying together the disaster with perspective on Japanese culture and geological history. It was accompanied by double-truck images filled with cinematic power that proplled the story forward. This photograph, by David Guttenfelder for AP, pulls back to reveal what once was Minamisanriku. Look closely at the center of the image; a survivor is riding a bicycle through the damage.

4. Rescue Workers

Closing in, photographer Adam Dean (Panos) photographed rescue workers piling bodies onto a truck in the town of Rikuzentakata in Iwate prefecture. The image also appeared with the New Yorker article.

5. Surface

Time magazine supplied a visual narrative, publishing a photo essay by James Nactwey, who, as the magazine noted, "was one of the first photographers on the ground in northern Japan after the earthquake and tsunami hit. Nachtwey also provided the text for the piece, in which he contrasted a "surface of reality [that] is unimaginable" with the journalist's compulsion to look "below the surface, where the human tragedy is equally unimaginable. To depict the surface, he constructed a panorama from a number of images.

6. Below the Surface

Here, Nactwey moves below the surface, showing us bodies lying in the ruins of a hospital in Minamisanriku.

Extraordinary Photos: The "Fukushima Fifty"

Today I expected to post about a number of things, including the photographic possibilites of the  Supermoon (was the sky clear where you were, 'cause here in New York it was more or less snowing. Hope your images were as awesome as these.) Then I thought I'd write about how Rick Norsigian and his team of lawyers seemed to have totally capitulated and agreed to never, ever say those glass plate negatives found at a garage sale were by Ansel Adams. Then I saw on Photo District News that a federal court  judge in New York ruled that Richard Prince--the artists also known as appropriator--infringed on photographer Patrick Carious's copyrights by creating a series of painting and a collage from photographs "torn" from Cariou's book Yes, Rasta.

But then I saw these images from released by Japan's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, which provide an extraordinary look inside the country's crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. I can't remember when "official" photographs have provided this type of powerful narrative. Some images move us because of their artfulness, or the story-telling skill of the image maker. But photography has the ability to stun us simply with its innate ability to document--in the end, that is the essential function of photography. It is the baseline. 

In this picture, we see a number of workers, their faces obscured by breathing gear, in the control room of the ruined  Unit 1 and Unit 2 reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi plant. These workers who have stayed to monitor and control the plants have become known as the "Fukushima Fifty." It's seldom a good thing when you are part of a group known by a name like that--it implies a select but doomed few, heroic yes, but we don't really separate the ideas of heroism and doom, do we? These are the people who are trying to get the pumps to bring in the water that might cool the nuclear reactors and spent fuel rods that may be melting down. Look at them. They are heroes. You don't see pictures like this every day.

 They worked in darkness, by flashlight.

 This is one of the power plant's control rooms. It is an abandoned, lonely place.

 This is the central control room of Fukushima Daiichi's Unit 3 reactor.  Unit 3 employs both uranium and plutonium as fuel, which, we are told, is potentially more dangerous than just uranium, which is what the other reactors use. This place looks orderly, but control is an abstract idea in this room now.

Here, workers help restore electricity to the Unit 3 and Unit 4 reactors--electricity to run pumps to bring water to cool the nuclear cores. I believe these images will last, will exist into the future as symbols that will, undoubtedly, be claimed as evidence by people who believe in all sorts of things. For now they simply show what a number of people were doing in a very, very bad situation.

Iconic Monday: Herbert Ponting and the Doomed Scott Expedition

Grotto in an Iceberg, Scott Expedition, by Herbert Ponting

 Amid all the photography and art at last week's AIPAD show in New york, it was the Heroic Age of Antarctice Adventure that captured my heart. Specifically, it was work by the photographer Herbert Ponting featured by the Steven Kasher Gallery (New York) and the Flo Peters Gallery (Hamburg) that knocked me out. One hundred years after Robert Falcon Scott led his doomed expedition to Antarctica, Ponting's images from the epic adventure are worth discovering.

Lawrence Oates by Ponting

Ponting's portrait of Charles Seymour Wright

 Like the images of the Ernest Shackleton Expedition, which were featured a few years ago in Caroline Alexander's marvelous book The Endurance: Shackleton's Legendary Antarctice Adventure, Ponting's photographs of Scott's Terra Nova Expedition to the Ross Sea and the South Pole bring to life an era of human questing as poignant as that of early manned space flight. Ponting's work was to have been the visual centerpiece of Scott's triumphant return from the Pole; instead, it was the tragic fate of the expedition that became the stuff of legend, while Ponting's documentation went largely by the wayside. Now it seems to be taking its rightful place in the history of art.

Captain Scott in His Den, by Ponting

 Ponting himself was a romantic by nature; born in England in 1870, he was enthralled by tales of the American West and eventually moved to California, where he tried his hand as a fruit rancher. The business failed so he took up photography, which seems to have fulfilled his need to tell thrilling tales. He documented the Russo-Japanese War in 1904 then continued traveling through the Far East and India. His images appeared in the mass market magazines that were making their appearance at the time—publications like Strand Magazine, home of Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes stories—and his growing renown led to Ponting's appointment as the photographer for Scott's much-anticipated second expedition to Antarctica. Ponting sailed on Scott's ship, the Terra Nova, and in 1911 helped set up the expedition's winter camp on Ross Island. Ponting documented the men and the scientific work of the expedition on glass plates, which he processed in a darkroom set up at the camp. The quality of the negatives was stunning, if the prints shown at the AIPAD are any indication.

Ponting wasn't part of the Scott party that later set out for South Pole; after spending 14 months in the Antarctic, he returned home with a number of other men and began to prepare his images for the lecture tour Scott was going to give when he returned, after becoming the first man to reach the South Pole. The images were vital for Scott—he had borrowed considerable funds to pay for the expedition, and he expected to pay off the loans in part with a series of lectures featuring lantern slides of Ponting's work.

Scott did reach the Pole, on January 17, 1912, only to discover that a rival team led by Roald Amundsen had been there before him. He'd been slowed down because of his unwise choice to use use horses rather than dogs to pull his sleds: When the horses succumbed to the harsh environment, his men had had to haul the heavy sleds themselves. Worse, he miscalculated the amount of food the men would need. On their return from the Pole, the team began to starve. There was heroic self-sacrifice—expedition member Lawrence Oates famously walked from his tent into a blizzard saying, "I am just going outside and may be some time"—but Scott and his team nonetheless perished after making a desperate but futile dash for food supplies they had cached; their bodies were discovered in November, 1912, by a party led by Charles Seymour Wright, a member of the Terra Nova expedition not included on the dash to the Pole. Also found was Scott's diary, which became a literary sensation when it was published. Compared to the grand tragedy of Scott's words, Ponting's pictures, which instead told a story of intrepid success, were beside the point and largely ignored. Then in 1914 World War I began, and the piece of history that Ponting had recorded slipped away from view. In journalism as in art, timing is everything.

Ponting Self-Portrait

Ponting did publish his Antarctica work in 1921 to popular acclaim, and he helped make a short film with footage he shot at Scott's winter camp. He traveled and lectured, but the world moved on. Ponting died in London in 1935. Now, through the means of an art show on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, his story is being retold.